<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Giles Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gileslegal.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gileslegal.com</link>
	<description>experience counts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:10:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Basic Differences Between Mediation and Arbitration in Commercial Litigation</title>
		<link>http://gileslegal.com/2012/02/basic-differences-between-mediation-and-arbitration-in-commercial-litigation-2/</link>
		<comments>http://gileslegal.com/2012/02/basic-differences-between-mediation-and-arbitration-in-commercial-litigation-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy R. Giles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gileslegal.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In civil commercial litigation, MEDIATION generally looks like a settlement conference.  Both sides present their position to a neutral mediator.  The mediator typically separates the parties and speaks to each side separately (and often confidentially) regarding the pros and cons of their positions, evidence, and arguments.  If the parties are able to reach a settlement, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In civil commercial litigation, MEDIATION generally looks like a settlement conference.  Both sides present their position to a neutral mediator.  The mediator typically separates the parties and speaks to each side separately (and often confidentially) regarding the pros and cons of their positions, evidence, and arguments.  If the parties are able to reach a settlement, paperwork is drawn up to settle the case.  If a settlement is not reached, the parties are free to continue to litigate the case.  Mediation typically does not require that a party do anything other than participate in good faith.  A party is not required to settle, and the mediator typically does not have the authority to render any kind of decision or judgment without the agreement of the parties.  (Some exceptions exist.).  Courts often mandate, however, that the parties <em>participate</em> in mediation, even though no result or settlement is required.</p>
<p>ARBITRATION looks more like an informal trial.  Both sides present their case, including evidence and arguments, to a neutral arbitrator, who then renders a decision just as a judge would in court.  In Maricopa County, Arizona, cases seeking less than $50,000 in damages are required to go to an arbitrator.  The arbitrator’s decision, however, generally may be appealed to the Superior Court by either party.  In some cases, where the parties have agreed by contract that a case will go to binding arbitration rather than to a court, the arbitrator’s decision may be final, with no rights of appeal.  Be aware of such arbitration clauses in contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gileslegal.com/2012/02/basic-differences-between-mediation-and-arbitration-in-commercial-litigation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy New Year</title>
		<link>http://gileslegal.com/2012/01/happy-new-year/</link>
		<comments>http://gileslegal.com/2012/01/happy-new-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy R. Giles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preparation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gileslegal.com/wordpress/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy New Year!  In the spirit of the new year, I am starting this blog, which will be updated once per month.  Its purpose is simply to give an overview of a legal issue, dilemma, or topic from which I believe numerous people might benefit.  PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT THE ITEMS DISCUSSED IN THIS BLOG DO [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!  In the spirit of the new year, I am starting this blog, which will be updated once per month.  Its purpose is simply to give an overview of a legal issue, dilemma, or topic from which I believe numerous people might benefit.  PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT THE ITEMS DISCUSSED IN THIS BLOG DO NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE AND ARE NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE.  The reason for this disclaimer is that every situation is different.  The laws of various states or countries may apply, and the facts of each situation may dictate different results.  These posts will simply give the reader an overview, or introduction, to a topic so the reader may have a little bit of information in his or her back pocket before making decisions about how to handle a particular issue.</p>
<p>This first post will address something that I have told nearly all of my clients:  Litigation is usually expensive, lengthy, and takes an emotional toll; therefore, suing someone is a decision that should be made with care.  Even in a case where you believe you are 100% right and have obviously been wronged, you will not be spared the expense and effort required by litigation.  The other side almost always believes in its position as much as you do.  Cases can easily take two years or more to litigate.  Some claims allow the winner to recoup its attorneys’ fees from the loser, but the litigant still must be able to fund the litigation until a winner and loser can be declared.  And there are no guarantees.  Why do I tell you this?  After all, I make my living representing people who DO want to litigate.  I tell you this because I don’t want anyone getting into something they regret.  I want litigants to be as prepared as possible for what lies ahead.  I want litigants to make an informed decision, so that once they decide to go to court, they’re all in.  I want litigants to have reasonable expectations and I want those expectations to be met.  I have seen many people cause themselves a lot of suffering because they made decisions about litigation with their emotions—especially anger.  Litigation is a financial/business decision and should be treated as such.  In many cases it makes sense, and thank goodness we have a justice system that allows litigants to bring claims against those who have wronged them.  Such a decision, however, should always be made with one’s head and not one’s heart.  Indeed, one of the benefits of having a lawyer is to help clients manage their emotions—to give them just the facts and probabilities, or, in other words, to help them use their own heads.  Here’s to a year full of smart decisions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gileslegal.com/2012/01/happy-new-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

